Archive for the ‘Privacy’ Category

G8 Summit To Discuss “Anti-Counterfeiting”

July 4th, 2008

The G8 is meeting next week in Japan, and one of the things on the agenda is the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). The treaty, proposed by US Trade Representative Susan C. Schwab last October, is being negotiated in secret with Canada, the EU, Japan, Mexico, Korea, New Zealand, and Switzerland.

Thankfully, Wikileaks obtained a copy of a “Discussion Paper” disseminated to entertainment industry lobbyists, and has posted a summary:

The agreement covers the copying of information or ideas in a wide variety of contexts. For example page three, paragraph one is a “Pirate Bay killer” clause designed to criminalize the non-profit facilitation of unauthorized information exchange on the internet. This clause would also negatively affect transparency and primary source journalism sites such as Wikileaks.

The document reveals a proposal for a multi-lateral trade agreement of strict enforcement of intellectual property rights related to Internet activity and trade in information-based goods hiding behind the issue of false trademarks. If adopted, a treaty of this form would impose a strong, top-down enforcement regime, with new cooperation requirements upon internet service providers, including perfunctionary disclosure of customer information. The proposal also bans “anti-circumvention” measures which may affect online anonymity systems and would likely outlaw multi-region CD/DVD players.

The proposal also specifies a plan to encourage developing nations to accept the legal regime.

The deal would also set up border guards to be IP cops:

The deal would create a international regulator that could turn border guards and other public security personnel into copyright police. The security officials would be charged with checking laptops, iPods and even cellular phones for content that “infringes” on copyright laws, such as ripped CDs and movies.

The guards would also be responsible for determining what is infringing content and what is not.

The agreement proposes any content that may have been copied from a DVD or digital video recorder would be open for scrutiny by officials — even if the content was copied legally.

[snip]

Anyone found with infringing content in their possession would be open to a fine.

They may also have their device confiscated or destroyed, according to the four-page document.

The trade agreement includes “civil enforcement” measures which give security personnel the “authority to order ex parte searches” (without a lawyer present) “and other preliminary measures”.

In Canada, border guards already perform random searches of laptops at airports to check for child pornography. ACTA would expand the role of those guards.

Posted in Bad news, Copyright, DRM, Fair use, International law, P2P, Privacy | Comments (0)

Google Ordered to Give Viacom YouTube History

July 3rd, 2008

The Judge has ordered Google to give all its YouTube history to Viacom, so that they can use it to see if copyright infringing videos are more popular than user created ones.

Although Google argued that turning over the data would invade its users’ privacy, the judge’s ruling (.pdf) described that argument as “speculative” and ordered Google to turn over the logs on a set of four tera-byte hard drives.

The judge also turned Google’s own defense of its data retention policies — that IP addresses of computers aren’t personally revealing in and of themselves, against it to justify the log dump.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has already reacted, calling the order a violation of the Video Privacy Protection act that “threatens to expose deeply private information.”

It sounds like the judge is ignorant in terms of technology. Have you ever heard of the AOL search engine history leak? Also, the article goes on to say that Viacom has asked for YouTube’s source code as well as any videos they have taken down. I think that’s pretty hilarious. “Hey, you are infringing on our copyrights! Now give us your source code and some pirated flicks.”

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Bad news, Copyright, Privacy | Comments (0)

House Approves Telecom Immunity

June 20th, 2008

The US house has approved telecom immunity.  The senate will vote next week.

Washington, D.C. – Privacy rights and the rule of law took a serious blow today when the House of Representatives passed blanket retroactive immunity for phone companies that participated in the president’s warrantless surveillance program. The FISA Amendments Act, H.R. 6304, which House Leadership rushed to the floor today after its introduction yesterday, passed by a vote of 293 to 129. The Senate is expected to vote on the bill next week.

The bill was touted as a bipartisan “compromise” on the issues of electronic surveillance and immunity. But in fact it requires dismissal of lawsuits against companies like AT&T that participated in the program as long as the companies received a piece of paper from the government indicating that the surveillance had been authorized by the president and was determined to be lawful.

I’m not optimistic about the senate vote.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Bad news, Privacy | Comments (0)