Archive for the ‘Fair use’ Category

Harry Potter Lexicon Case Appealed

November 12th, 2008
Steve Vander Ark - Credit: Dtobias on Wikipedia (CC BY-SA)

Steve Vander Ark - Credit: Dtobias on Wikipedia (CC BY-SA)

The Harry Potter Lexicon Case has been Appealed.

“Copyright and Fair Use” at Stanford Law School reports that the defendant publisher, RDR Books, has filed an appeal from the Judge’s decision in Warner Bros. Pictures v. RDR Books, the case involving the Harry Potter Lexicon.

The Judge, after a bench trial, issued an injunction and statutory damages of $6750 holding that the Lexicon was not protected by fair use due to (a) sloppiness in attribution in sections, (b) the length of some of the quotes, and (c) imitation of J.K. Rowling’s writing style in portions.

I’m not that optimistic about this guy’s case.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in Copyright, Court, Fair use, Law | Comments (0)

Brave New Films v. Savage

October 14th, 2008

Savage is at it again and this time it is Stanford’s Fair Use Center that gets to show Savage what happens when you ignore copyright law.

Last October, conservative shock jock Michael Savage went on a tirade against Muslims, screaming, “Take your religion and shove it up your behind! I’m sick of you!”

So Brave New Films put together a clip called “Michael Savage hates Muslims” and put it on YouTube. (You can still see it here). Savage’s lawyers fired off a take-down notice in late September, claiming that the filmmakers were violating his copyright on the broadcast and YouTube took the video down.

Yesterday, Stanford’s Fair Use Project announced that it has sued (.pdf) Savage and his radio company on behalf of Brave New Films. It’s asking the court to rule that using clips of the radio show is fair use.

“Copyright law is not and should not be a tool for suppressing views you don’t like,” Tony Falzone, who heads the Fair Use Project, told Legal Pad. “That is smack dab in the heart of fair use — no one had any business sending a takedown notice for this.”

Savage has already lost one copyright case Savage v. CAIR relating to fair use.  He needs to send his copyright lawyer back to school to learn the basics.

Links:

Quote from legalpad

Tags: , ,
Posted in Court, Fair use, Law | Comments (0)

J.K. Rowling wins in Harry Potter Lexicon case

September 9th, 2008

Steve Vander Ark, creator of the Harry Potter Lexicon, speaking at the Sectus conference in London in 2007

J.K. Rowling has won nearly $7,000 in the Harry Potter Lexicon case. The judge ruled that it was not fair use.

n Warner Bros. Entertainment v. RDR Books, the judge has issued a 68-page decision, following a bench trial, in which he concluded that the “Harry Potter Lexicon” was not a “fair use” of J. K. Rowling’s copyrighted material from the Harry Potter series.

The court concluded that the work was “transformative”, but that portions which quoted the original language too heavily were less transformative; that the use was clearly commercial in nature; that the defendant had not been guilty of bad faith; that there was more “verbatim copying” than was “reasonably necessary”; work was clearly for financial gain; and that while the lexicon did not compete with the novels, it would compete with a planned “derivate work”, Ms. Rowling’s planned encyclopedia, would compete with 2 “companion books” Ms. Rowling had written, and — although plaintiffs had offered no evidence of any intention to market poems and songs — would compete with their marketing poems and songs were they inclined to enter into that market.

The judge awarded plaintiffs $6750 in statutory damages, and issued an injunction against the publication.

It’s the new hip marketing strategy. Sue your fans.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in Copyright, Court, Fair use, Law | Comments (0)

G8 Summit To Discuss “Anti-Counterfeiting”

July 4th, 2008

The G8 is meeting next week in Japan, and one of the things on the agenda is the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). The treaty, proposed by US Trade Representative Susan C. Schwab last October, is being negotiated in secret with Canada, the EU, Japan, Mexico, Korea, New Zealand, and Switzerland.

Thankfully, Wikileaks obtained a copy of a “Discussion Paper” disseminated to entertainment industry lobbyists, and has posted a summary:

The agreement covers the copying of information or ideas in a wide variety of contexts. For example page three, paragraph one is a “Pirate Bay killer” clause designed to criminalize the non-profit facilitation of unauthorized information exchange on the internet. This clause would also negatively affect transparency and primary source journalism sites such as Wikileaks.

The document reveals a proposal for a multi-lateral trade agreement of strict enforcement of intellectual property rights related to Internet activity and trade in information-based goods hiding behind the issue of false trademarks. If adopted, a treaty of this form would impose a strong, top-down enforcement regime, with new cooperation requirements upon internet service providers, including perfunctionary disclosure of customer information. The proposal also bans “anti-circumvention” measures which may affect online anonymity systems and would likely outlaw multi-region CD/DVD players.

The proposal also specifies a plan to encourage developing nations to accept the legal regime.

The deal would also set up border guards to be IP cops:

The deal would create a international regulator that could turn border guards and other public security personnel into copyright police. The security officials would be charged with checking laptops, iPods and even cellular phones for content that “infringes” on copyright laws, such as ripped CDs and movies.

The guards would also be responsible for determining what is infringing content and what is not.

The agreement proposes any content that may have been copied from a DVD or digital video recorder would be open for scrutiny by officials — even if the content was copied legally.

[snip]

Anyone found with infringing content in their possession would be open to a fine.

They may also have their device confiscated or destroyed, according to the four-page document.

The trade agreement includes “civil enforcement” measures which give security personnel the “authority to order ex parte searches” (without a lawyer present) “and other preliminary measures”.

In Canada, border guards already perform random searches of laptops at airports to check for child pornography. ACTA would expand the role of those guards.

Posted in Bad news, Copyright, DRM, Fair use, International law, P2P, Privacy | Comments (0)

Expelled Movie Escapes Yoko Ono’s Motion for an Injunction

June 2nd, 2008

Thanks to Lessig and friends, the judge just threw out Yoko Ono’s motion for an injunction against Expelled.

We (Stanford’s Fair Use Project) got word of another great success today. We’re representing the filmmakers of Ben Stein’s Expelled. The film is an attack on the culture that forbids “intelligent design” from being considered seriously. (I’m a member of that culture.) The film uses a 15 second snippet of John Lennon’s “Imagine.” Yoko Ono was not happy with the use, and sued. In a decision issued this morning, Judge Stein denied Ono’s motion for an injunction against the film, finding we were likely to prevail on our fair use defense.

I’d really like to see Siva and Larry debate about this one.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Court, Fair use, Good news | Comments (0)